Check out our Youtube channel for great information and tips:
https://www.youtube.com/@PestProtectionPlus
Wildlife trapping and exclusion are two common methods used to get rid of animals such as raccoons, skunks, and squirrels that have invaded homes and gardens. While both methods can be effective in removing these animals, there are some key differences between the two that you should be aware of.
First, let’s define each method. Wildlife trapping involves using traps to capture the animals and then removing them from the area. The type of trap used depends on the animal being targeted, but common examples include cage traps for raccoons and squirrels, and live traps for skunks.
Exclusion, on the other hand, involves blocking off the animals’ access to your home and garden. This can be done through the use of physical barriers such as mesh or wire fencing, or by sealing off any holes or openings that the animals may be using to get into your home.
Now, let’s compare the two methods in terms of their effectiveness. In terms of removing the animals from your property, both trapping and exclusion can be effective. Trapping will directly capture the animals and remove them from the area. Exclusion will prevent them from accessing the areas where they have been causing problems.
However, there are some key differences in the effectiveness of the two methods. For one, trapping can be more difficult and time-consuming, especially if you are dealing with multiple animals or if the animals are particularly difficult to catch. In addition, trapping can be dangerous, especially if you are dealing with larger or more aggressive animals such as raccoons.
Exclusion, on the other hand, is generally easier and safer to implement. It does not require you to directly handle the animals, and it can be done without the need for specialized equipment or training. In addition, exclusion is a long-term solution that will prevent the animals from returning to your property once they have been removed.
Another key difference between the two methods is their impact on the animals themselves. Trapping can be harmful to the animals, especially if they are not removed from the trap in a timely manner. In addition, the stress of being trapped can cause the animals to become aggressive, which can make it more difficult to handle them.
Exclusion, on the other hand, is generally more humane, as it does not require the animals to be directly handled or stressed. It simply prevents them from accessing your property, allowing them to find food and shelter elsewhere.
In terms of cost, trapping and exclusion vary depending on the specific situation. Trapping will require the use of specialized equipment, which is expensive to purchase or rent. In addition, the cost of hiring a professional to set and remove the traps also adds to the overall expense.
Exclusion, will involve the purchase of materials such as fencing or mesh, which can be more affordable than specialized traps. In addition, exclusion can be done by homeowners themselves, which can save on labor costs.
Overall, both wildlife trapping and exclusion are effective methods for getting rid of animals such as raccoons, skunks, and squirrels. However, each method has its own strengths and weaknesses. The best option depends on the specific situation. Generally, exclusion is a more humane and long-term solution, while trapping can be more effective in removing the animals quickly. It is important to carefully consider the pros and cons of each method before deciding on the best course of action.
Learn more about humane wildlife removal services here:
https://www.pestprotectionplus.com/wildlife-removal/
0 Comment